← Field Notes
·8 September 2026·4 min read

Hidden Fees, Real Fines: Australia's New Drip-Pricing Law

From 1 July 2027, Australia's Unfair Trading Practices Act forces businesses to show unavoidable fees with the base price. What tradies and firms must fix.

Advertise a job 'from $89', then add a call-out fee, an after-hours loading and a booking charge before the customer can say yes — and you're doing something Australia is about to police far more tightly. From 1 July 2027, the Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Act 2026 requires any business selling to households to show the unavoidable cost of a purchase up front, alongside the headline price. Get it wrong and the penalties reach the greater of $100 million, three times the benefit, or 30 per cent of turnover — the last limb being the one built to scale to a small business.

This isn't aimed at big platforms alone. If you advertise a price and let mandatory fees appear later in the flow, the rule is about to apply to you.

Drip pricing — advertising a low headline number, then letting compulsory fees 'drip' in through the checkout — has breached the Australian Consumer Law for years as misleading conduct. The ACCC has pursued it: Dendy Cinemas and Webjet both paid penalties for adding mandatory booking fees late. What the Unfair Trading Practices Act does is stop leaving it to case-by-case enforcement and write the rule down. Parliament passed the Act on 2 July 2026; the pricing provisions commence 1 July 2027.

The mechanics are specific. When you display a base price, you now have to disclose any per-transaction charge that comes with it — the amount, or how it's calculated; that it's a per-transaction charge; whether it applies to every payment method or only some; and whether the base price already includes it. All of it has to sit close to the headline price, legible and unambiguous, shown at the same time — not revealed three screens later. Payment surcharges and taxes are handled under separate rules and sit outside this particular obligation.

$100M

Maximum penalty per contravention

Or 30% of turnover, or 3× the benefit

1 Jul 2027

All-in price rules commence

Act passed Parliament 2 Jul 2026

21%

Of Australians hit hidden charges online

ACCC survey of 3,000+, past 12 months

Want to know what this means for your business? We'll map it in one call.

Book a call →

Two kinds of business should read this closely. The first is anyone who advertises a 'from' price and takes payment online or by app — a trades business with a booking page, a clinic, a services firm with an online checkout. If a fee is unavoidable, it now belongs next to the headline number, not at the end of the flow. The second is anyone whose booking, quoting or checkout software adds those fees automatically. The compliance point that matters: the law is technology-neutral, so if an AI-driven quoting or checkout tool reveals fees progressively by default, the liability sits with you — the business that deployed it — not the vendor that built it. We made the same point about AI tools that set a different price for different customers; the principle is identical here.

The ACCC has already put a number on how common this is. In its Digital Platform Services Inquiry, a survey of more than 3,000 Australians found 72 per cent had struck a potentially unfair practice on an online marketplace in the past year — 21 per cent of them hidden charges. This is a revenue-capture and trust question as much as a compliance one: the 'from $89' quote that becomes $140 at checkout wins the click and loses the customer, and now it carries a regulatory tail as well. If you're not sure whether your own quoting flow would pass, see where your exposure sits.

Unfair practices Australians met online

Source: ACCC Digital Platform Services Inquiry (3,000+ surveyed)

Any unfair practice
72%
Forced subscription
24%
Hidden charges
21%
Accidental subscription
10%

You have about a year, and the fix is mostly display, not strategy. Walk your own booking or quote flow as a first-time customer and find the point where the number changes. Any fee the customer can't avoid — a booking fee, a service fee, a standard call-out — belongs with the advertised price, stated plainly, not sprung at the end. If you advertise 'from $X', make sure $X is a price a real customer can actually pay without a mandatory add-on appearing later. And if the culprit is a default setting in your booking or checkout software, fix it now rather than discovering it in a complaint.

None of this costs margin. A customer who sees the real number up front and books anyway is a customer who trusts the next quote too — and the businesses that treat this as a trust upgrade, not a compliance chore, are the ones it will reward. A short conversation can pressure-test whether your quoting and booking flow shows the price the law will soon require — and whether the AI tools underneath it are helping or quietly working against you.

Key takeaways

From 1 July 2027, the Unfair Trading Practices Act 2026 requires businesses selling to households to display unavoidable transaction fees alongside the base price — legibly, and at the same time, not at the end of the checkout.
Drip pricing already breaches the Australian Consumer Law as misleading conduct — the ACCC has penalised Dendy Cinemas and Webjet — but the new law writes the disclosure rule down explicitly.
Penalties reach the greater of $100 million, three times the benefit, or 30 per cent of turnover; the turnover limb is the one that scales to an SME.
The law is technology-neutral: if your AI booking or checkout tool drips fees in by default, the liability is yours, not the vendor's. Card surcharges and taxes are handled under separate rules.

Common questions

Is drip pricing illegal in Australia?

Yes. Advertising a low headline price and adding unavoidable fees later is misleading conduct under the Australian Consumer Law, and the ACCC has penalised businesses including Dendy Cinemas and Webjet for it. From 1 July 2027, the Unfair Trading Practices Act 2026 adds an explicit rule requiring mandatory transaction fees to be shown with the base price.

What counts as drip pricing?

Advertising a 'from' price, then revealing compulsory fees — booking fees, service fees, handling charges — gradually through the purchase so the final price is higher than the one advertised. The new law requires any such per-transaction charge to be disclosed alongside the headline price, legibly and at the same time.

Do the new rules cover card surcharges?

No. The drip-pricing disclosure rule covers mandatory transaction-based charges shown with a base price; payment surcharges and taxes are dealt with under separate rules. But a surcharge that misleads a customer can still breach the Australian Consumer Law.

Sources

Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Act 2026 (No. 64, 2026) — Federal Register of Legislation

ACCC — Price displays (business guidance on drip pricing)

DLA Piper — Australia introduces new unfair trading practices laws (July 2026)

Assumptions & methodology
  1. The Competition and Consumer Amendment (Unfair Trading Practices) Act 2026 (No. 64, 2026) passed both Houses of Parliament on 2 July 2026; its unfair trading, drip-pricing and subscription-contract provisions commence on 1 July 2027. Commencement and penalty details are as set out on the Federal Register of Legislation and in contemporaneous analysis by DLA Piper and Norton Rose Fulbright (July 2026).
  2. The drip-pricing disclosure requirements — that a per-transaction charge shown with a base price must state the amount or method of calculation, that it is a per-transaction charge, whether it applies to some or all payment methods, and whether it is already included in the base price, displayed legibly and close to the base price — apply to goods and services ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use, and exclude optional charges, payment surcharges and taxes, per DLA Piper's analysis of the Act (July 2026).
  3. Maximum penalties for a body corporate are the greater of $100 million, three times the value of the benefit obtained, or 30 per cent of adjusted turnover during the breach period; the maximum for an individual is $2.5 million. The $100 million corporate ceiling reflects the doubling of Australian Consumer Law penalties that took effect on 28 March 2026.
  4. The 72 per cent and 21 per cent figures are from the ACCC's Digital Platform Services Inquiry, which reported a survey of more than 3,000 Australians finding 72 per cent had encountered a potentially unfair practice on an online marketplace within 12 months, including hidden charges (21 per cent), forced subscription sign-ups (24 per cent) and accidental paid subscriptions (10 per cent).
  5. Last reviewed 8 September 2026. General information, not legal advice — confirm your obligations with a qualified adviser before relying on them.

Related notes

ShareLinkedInEmail

Field Notes are general commentary on AI trends for Australian businesses. They don’t constitute professional advice. Talk to your accountant, lawyer, or IT adviser before acting on anything specific to your situation — or talk to us if you want help working out where AI fits.

Don't miss the next one

Get each new Field Note in your inbox as it publishes — short, practical AI intelligence for business owners.

Would your quote survive the new all-in price rule?

The fix is mostly in how your booking and checkout flow shows a number — and in the AI tools sitting underneath it. A short conversation can pressure-test both before the rules bite. Book a call.

Book a call →